Accountability & Transparency
The Record.
This is what has happened on the current board’s watch. These are not opinions ā they are documented news reports, court filings, and public records. Voters deserve to know.
JeneƩ Littrell is running because students deserve better than this. Every item below is sourced, linked, and on the record.
Times of San Diego reports the board voted 3-2 not to censure Trustee Jim Kelly after public records allegedly showed he shared an attorney-client privileged memo with outsiders and tried to influence the superintendent through intermediaries. Board President Rob Shield, who wrote the censure, and Trustee Chris Fite voted in favor. Kelly, Gary Woods and Scott Eckert voted against, and Kelly denied the accusations.
KPBS reports the same board that eliminated all librarian positions is now redirecting millions of dollars toward athletics ā drawing sharp community scrutiny over the district’s stated priorities.
The Grossmont Education Association ā which endorsed the conservative incumbents just four years ago ā has shifted course, endorsing three challenger candidates including JeneĆ© Littrell. The union’s new president, a former librarian targeted for elimination, called the board unrepresentative of East County’s diversity.
Nine librarians and a former administrator filed new lawsuits alleging the board majority weaponized personal beliefs to purge LGBTQ staff and resources from the district.
KPBS reports that the district is facing a growing set of lawsuits alleging the board majority pursued an anti-LGBTQ+ agenda, including claims tied to the elimination of staff positions and the removal of library resources.
Press release and official complaint from the plaintiffs’ law firm detailing claims by former teacher-librarians that the district retaliated against them, discriminated against them, and unlawfully eliminated their positions.
A San Diego County civil grand jury found the 2023 board vote to reject the mental health provider was based on misrepresented claims about LGBTQ+ services, leaving students without six clinicians and suicide prevention services for four months.
Voice of San Diego’s education newsletter covers the civil grand jury’s rebuke of the board, focused on the decision that left students without contracted mental health services.
Times of San Diego reports on the civil grand jury’s finding that the board’s contract decision left students without mental health care for months.
Complete investigation and findings from the 2025-2026 San Diego County Civil Grand Jury documenting the Grossmont school board’s decision-making process, the anti-LGBTQ+ basis for contract denial, impact on students, and 10 recommendations for governance reform.
Coverage of the Grossmont board voting for significant salary increases for themselves while simultaneously issuing layoff notices to staff.
The board voted to approve a $1.7 million funding increase for the district’s athletics programs.
East County Magazine covers the athletics funding boost and the community scrutiny it drew over the trustees’ motives and prior track record.
After a 3-2 vote, the board was legally required to pass protocols for responding to immigration enforcement on campus ā with trustees Kelly and Woods voting no.
Local community video coverage compiling the district’s recent lawsuits and developments.
Detailed report on the board’s unanimous vote to raise their monthly stipend from $534 to $2,000 ā labeled “tone deaf” by community members who had just seen 61 positions eliminated.
The district paid a record settlement to a former special education director following allegations of anti-LGBTQ discrimination ā the largest of its kind in the district’s history.
The board faced legal backlash and community outrage after proposing to restrict protests and free speech on public property outside district meetings.
KPBS previews the board’s October 9, 2025 meeting. The agenda included revisions to the religious beliefs and customs policy, a proposal to replace all school librarians with a single district librarian, and a policy creating “no-activity zones” that would restrict protests and leafleting outside board meetings.
An investigation into unethical election tactics ā including fake candidates introduced to steer votes ā used to maintain the current board majority, with potential conflicts of interest.
A major investigative report revealing private board communications regarding “loyalty tests,” “RIF, RIF, RIF” directives, and plans for retaliatory staff layoffs ā raising potential Brown Act violations.
Reports on the board’s secretive process for hiring the current Superintendent without meaningful public involvement or a transparent search.
The board finalized the elimination of 61 positions, including all librarians, despite the district holding over $100 million in reserves ā triggering a formal recall campaign.
Initial coverage of the controversial 4-1 vote that triggered widespread community protests, student walkouts, and eventual legal action against the district.
What comes next
JeneĆ© Littrell has spent 25 years inside these schools ā as a counselor, an administrator, and a community builder. She knows what accountability looks like, and she knows this board isn’t delivering it.